Research.
Investigate, Explore, Delve Into, Examine, Make inquiries, Seek, Follow a Line
of Investigation.
It did
not take me long before I soon adopted the research attitude of unless I can
prove it, it is possibly wrong.
Not all
one sees or reads on the internet is totally true and some, sadly, is wholly
incorrect and misleading. Even the large organisations are not exempt.
Until the 1st March 2016 the Commonwealth War Graves Commission had the
incorrect date of death for George Stockburn Middleton [see the section The Wolviston
Men] and also consequently, the incorrect inscription on his headstone.
The
lesson that I very quickly learnt was check everything then check it again.
Though I had originally taken the date of death details from the CWGC web site
as true it soon became clear due to my own research that in the case of
Middleton the CWGC had got it wrong and a search of the internet showed many
other individuals and organisations had also. Why would anyone question the
CWGC? My reply would be why not.
The point
of this is to make sure any research is robust and question everything.
Regimental
Numbers.
But it is only a number, isn't it?
The
regimental number of a serviceman or servicewoman is one of the pieces of
information that is usually available to the researcher which sadly is often
under-utilised. The number was used on almost every item of paper dealing with
the soldier and is even engraved on the rim of his medals. Generally [there are
always exceptions to any rule] it is the number that will eventually confirm
and identify the correct individual even when dealing with large groups of
people or where common surnames occur frequently.
Occasionally
the number may have a prefix of a letter or group of letters or another number
and this may also help in learning more or building a larger picture of the
soldier’s career path, if for example he may have moved or been transferred
between battalions or regiments. The Army Service Corps for example extensively
used a single or double letter prefix to indicate which branch of the Corps a
man was attached to for trade or employment purposes.
However
the whole subject of regimental numbering is fraught with problems and
it is a
very complex subject. Some battalions within the same regiment had its
own
series of numbers each starting from 1, so it was possible for there to
be 1234
Pte Smith in the 1st Battalion, 1234 Pte Smith in the 2nd Battalion and
1234
Pte Smith in the 3rd Battalion. As mentioned, occasionally to get
around any
confusion, the battalions might prefix the individuals number with the
battalion number, so in our example it might be 1/1234 Pte Smith,
2/1234 Pte Smith and 3/1234 Pte Smith. Later if 2/1234 Pte Smith were
to be transferred
to the 3rd Battalion he would not be confused with 3/1234 Pte Smith.
The researcher would
see also that whilst 2/1234 Pte Smith was serving with 3rd Battalion at
the time of his
death [for example] he had originally belonged to the 2nd Battalion and
so for
the researcher this may open another line of enquiry.
Territorial
battalions followed a similar system until 1 March 1917 when under Army Council
Instruction 2414 of December 1916 they were re-numbered with six digit numbers
starting from 200,001.
Even if
the soldiers service papers do not survive, and many do not, it is possible to
estimate fairly accurately his enlistment date by searching for other numbers
bracketing the individuals regimental number and seeing if other service papers
do survive. For example a soldier has the regimental number of W/239 and he
belonged to the 13th Battalion Cheshire Regiment, his papers do not survive.
However the service papers for the following soldiers do survive and give their
enlistment dates. W/191 enlists 5 Sept 1914; W/219 enlists 4 Sept 1914; W/265
enlists 5 Sept 1914 and W/289 enlists 3 Sept 1914. Given this evidence it is
reasonable to assume that our soldier W/239 enlisted sometime between the 3rd
and 5th Sept 1914. But this practice was not universal among infantry
battalions.
As a
point of interest and as an example of how problematic the regimental numbering
system was. There were 220 soldiers each issued with the same number of 1883
between 1914 and 1918. Of those 37 died during the war.
It was
not until 1920 that all new soldiers and the Army Reserve received a unique
Army number and this system continues to this day.
Enlistment.
Hurry up and join lads, it will all be over by Christmas.
Volunteers.
At the outbreak of war Field Marshal Lord Kitchener as the newly empowered
Minister of State for War convinced the Government that the war with Germany
would not be a short affair. He told them that in his opinion it would take
three or even more years to fight and defeat a highly trained and well equipped
enemy force. As a direct result of his beliefs Kitchener encouraged early mass
recruitment and hundreds of thousands of men from all groups and levels of
society rushed to enlist. The men who were all volunteers were by and large
assigned to new formations that were specifically created to cater for the
rapid expansion of the Army. The volunteers would enlist for three years or the
duration of the war and in the early days were mostly allowed to choose which
regiment they may join. Five new armies were created and were referred to as
Kitchener Army. They were numbered K1 to K5. These armies contained six
divisions [K5 had seven] each division consisting of twelve battalions.
Numbers
of new recruits had begun fall and so on the 15th July 1915 a National
Registration Act was introduced making it compulsory for all men and woman
between the ages of 15 and 65 to comply with the act and register, stating
their occupation and ability to work and they were then issued with a
registration card. It allowed the Government a snapshot in early 1915 of
potential recruits and also industry employment figures and those in reserved
occupations.
Derby
Scheme.
The influx of men coming forward to enlist slowly started to reduce and the
Government decided that other measures to maintain a continual and sustained
level of recruitment were needed. On the 11th October 1915 Lord Derby was
appointed Director General of Recruiting and devised and introduced a scheme
known as the ‘Derby Scheme’. The Derby Scheme then asked males who were not in
a reserved occupation and between the ages of 18 and 41 to either enlist now or
to register their willingness to enlist and they would be called as required at
a later date. It was also made clear that voluntary enlistment may soon be a
thing of the past and conscription was on the horizon Attesters wore an armband
whilst still in civilian clothes and waiting to be called forward to show their
willingness to serve.
These
Derby Scheme men were organized into 46 groups and classified depending on age
and marital status.
Groups 1
– 23: Single men aged between 18 and 41, one group per year.
Groups 24
– 46: Married men aged between 18 and 41, one group per year.
The
process identified over two million potential recruits but many did not
register before the Derby Scheme closed on 15 December 1915. Often those who
did register were not called forward for many months anyway.
Conscription.
The Military Service Act came into force in January 1916 it was later
amended and modified on the 25th May 1916 to include married
men and made enlistment into the armed forces compulsory from 2nd
March 1916. Every British male resident who was between the ages of 18 and 41
on the 15th August 1915 and unmarried or a widower was liable for
military service unless he had a child or a dependent relative to support.
These conscripts were also placed into groups.
Between
January and June 1916 the groups and classes were called up in the following
order:
Groups 1
– 23 Single Derby Scheme men 25 January – 28th March
Groups 1
– 23 Single Conscript men 3rd – 28th March
Groups 24
– 46 Married Derby Scheme men 7th March – 13th June
Groups 24
– 46 Married Conscripts 3rd – 24th June
There
were those who claimed or attempted to claim exemptions and local tribunals
heard appeals against service. These appeals and the tribunal’s decisions were
often reported in the local and national newspapers. If exempted from service
the exemption was often if not always conditional. If a man was exempted due to
a reserved occupation for example, should he later leave that occupation he
became liable once again for military service. The first notice an individual
often received of his call up under National Conscription was the issue of a
railway warrant for his travel to the reporting centre by a set date and time.
By April 1918 the age limits for conscription were extend to include those
between the ages of 18 and 50.
War
Gratuity.
Money if you live and money if you die.
The war
gratuity was introduced in December 1918 as a payment to be made to those men
who had served during the war for a period of 6 months or more home service or
for any length of service if a man had served overseas. The rules governing the
gratuity were implemented under Army Order 17 of 1919.
In most
cases the war gratuity was paid to men in lieu of a service gratuity due under
the Royal Pay Warrant however, as the war gratuity was not introduced until
1918, many men had already been paid the service gratuity and therefore, when
it was calculated, the war gratuity had to be adjusted so a man did not receive
the full value of both.
There
is much information that the War Gratuity Payment and the Register of
Soldier’s
Effects for deceased soldiers can help the researcher with, it may also
help
with estimating a month of enlistment. Due to the rules governing
the
gratuity setting out payments for set periods [monthly] and allowing
for rank
and if service was home or overseas. It is possible for the researcher
to take
these various factors and work backwards from the known date of death
to arrive
at a month of enlistment. Though like many things the researcher must
allow for
some error factor. Depending on the day of the month the soldier died
depends if a whole months payment was made or an amount equating to a
percentage of a whole months payment.
However
if an approximate month of enlistment is arrived at using the war gratuity and
then the researcher also attempts to use the regimental number bracketing
mentioned above to try and find others with very close regimental numbers whose
service papers do survive a more clearer and larger picture begins to build.